Citation
[1] M. Rosenblum, E. T. Chin, E. L. Ogburn, et al. “Incorrect statistical reasoning in Guyll et al. leads to biased claims about strength of forensic evidence”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121.45 (Nov. 05, 2024), p. e2315431121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2315431121.
NoteBibtex
@article{rosenblumIncorrectStatisticalReasoning2024,
author = {Michael Rosenblum and Elizabeth T. Chin and Elizabeth L. Ogburn and Akihiko Nishimura and Daniel Westreich and Abhirup Datta and Susan Vanderplas and Maria Cuellar and William C. Thompson},
title = {Incorrect statistical reasoning in {Guyll et al.} leads to biased claims about strength of forensic evidence},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
volume = {121},
number = {45},
pages = {e2315431121},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2315431121},
publisher = {National Academy of Sciences},
year = {2024},
month = {nov},
}